|
|
|
|
Side bar. I have often argued that a good equipment review
should evaluate the component under test in at least two different systems. This
would identify compatibility issues and highlight the real strengths and
weaknesses of the component, and not just how it happens to perform when
connected to a single component at one end and possibly another component at the
other end. There is comfortable logic to that argument. It would be like taking
a test drive on a winding mountain road and not finding out how the car cruises
at high speed on the freeway. How can you predict how the component might
perform in your system unless reviewers tell you how it performs in a variety of
other systems? However, my evaluation system has been very carefully
some might say obsessively assembled over many years to yield very high
resolution, wide-band neutral sound with a variety of sources, and that one
critical characteristic that eludes most systems Ive heard: pleasure. (See
the Zen Page.) Also, my system is electrically benign, the preamp has standard
input and low output impedances, the amplifiers have a relatively high input
impedance of 100k ohms, and the speakers have a mild impedance curve and are
relatively efficient. In other words, acoustically and electrically, the system
used to evaluate these cables is neutral, ultra-revealing, and easily
reproduced. The one caveat I would mention is that if you use very reactive
speakers, such as some ribbon designs, they may present such an unusual load
that the speaker cables would perform differently in your system. Uncommon but
possible. Back to the case. The Oval 9 replaced JPS Superconductor, which had been in-situ
for over a year. Break-in passed really quickly; the cables settled down to
about 90% of their final sound in about 5 hours, with the remaining 10% slowly
developing over the next 40 or so hours. After those 5 hours, several changes in
sound were immediately apparent. First, the midrange and treble became much more
balanced with eachother. Where the JPS had the oft-noted speed and vibrancy, the
Oval 9 was more relaxed and coherent without losing any detail. The JPS had a
tendency to sound hot, and the AP avoided this completely. In fact, more
detail was apparent, especially hall size and spatial cues, than with the JPS.
In a three-week comparison with Harmonic Technology Pro 9+ bi-wire speaker
cables, the area of very low level detail and spatial cues was where the Oval 9
was again superior. Otherwise, these two cables were remarkably similar. Bass impact and depth also improved with the Oval 9, and
the increase in bass detail was especially welcome. There was similar midrange
presence and voices were delineated about the same with both cables. Overall,
the AP Oval 9 gave a relaxed and detailed presentation without any tendency to
highlight any one frequency range. No tipped up highs or forward mids
at all. After about one year in my system, the performance remains very
dimensional, dynamic, and balanced from low bass to high treble. Very nice. So, its springtime. For some reason, this seems to be the
season for love and upgrades! I brought in a bi-wire pair of Silver Oval for
evaluation. The sparkling silver glistening through the clear jacket is very
attractive and much better looking that the half-clear/half-purple jacketed Oval
9. And the Silver Oval is much smaller, 12 gauge vs. the Oval 9 which
is, well, 9 gauge. After the About half way through the 2nd side, this extra
detail slowly started to become an intrusion on the performance, like I had a
bad seat for a great performance. It was like turning up the focus or detail
control on a monitor TV and seeing the pixels in too much relief from the
overall picture. There was a small but noticeable highlighting of upper midrange
and treble that took about 30 minutes of listening to become an issue. It was
almost as if there was a dip between the midrange and upper treble because
cymbals did not seem to have much body, although they would ring and
tinkle like it would never end. It is not a good thing if your cymbals
tinkle too much. Voices never sounded strident or glaring, but were more forward
than with the Oval 9 cables. Bass notes had a bit more detail with the silver
cable, while the gut-thumping impact I enjoyed with the Oval 9 was somewhat
lessened. I played another couple of records, master recordings from Sting
and Janis Ian, to see if the regular pressings were to blame, and then literally
pulled the plug. In my system, the Silver Oval was just too much of a good thing
due to a bit too much apparent detail that was out of balance with frequencies
in close proximity to the hot treble.
With the very fast and extended Atmasphere OTL amps,
the Oval 9 was the obvious winner. Im back to using the copper Oval 9, a
great cable, but dont take the Silver Oval off your shopping list. It would
be an ideal cable to try in a system using components with a classic tube
sound, such as some from Cary or Conrad Johnson, or many SET amplifiers. In
these systems, the Oval 9 might sound dark, but the Silver Oval could be just
about perfect. Where the Oval 9 is an almost universal speaker cable, and an
excellent performer, the Silver Oval is a bit more particular about the company
it keeps.
OVAL 9 Overall Rating:
|